B
Ben Jayson Uy
Platform Context
This proposal is intended for implementation within the Toddle ecosystem. It builds on staff profiles, class assignments, calendars, communication tools, student records, and role-based permissions, while introducing an integrated system for performance evaluation, wellbeing, school services feedback, and professional development tracking.
Overview
Create a Staff Performance, Evaluation & Wellbeing Management module that supports distinct but aligned workflows for Teaching Staff and Non-Teaching Staff, integrating performance evaluation, stakeholder feedback, school services evaluation, and professional development (PD) planning, with termly and yearly analytics.
Purpose and Rationale
The system will:
  • Ensure fair, role-appropriate evaluation for all staff
  • Capture student, parent/guardian, and internal service feedback
  • Monitor staff wellbeing, satisfaction, and service effectiveness over time
  • Link evaluation outcomes to targeted professional development
  • Support inspection, accreditation, and strategic improvement planning
Core Functional Requirements (Toddle-Aligned)
  1. Role-Based Staff Classification
Clear distinction between:
  • Teaching Staff (teachers, learning support teachers)
  • Non-Teaching Staff (administration, operations, IT, support services)
Role determines:
  • Evaluation instruments
  • Feedback sources
  • PD pathways and reporting views
Teaching Staff Evaluation Framework
  1. Teaching Performance & Instructional Evaluation
  • Formal teaching observations
  • Learning walks / walk-throughs
  • Classroom display and learning environment evaluations
  1. Multi-Source Feedback
  • Self-evaluation and peer evaluation
  • Leadership evaluation
  • Student feedback (age-appropriate, anonymized)
  • Parent/guardian feedback focused on communication, learning support, and wellbeing
Non-Teaching Staff Evaluation Framework
  1. Non-Teaching Performance & Service Delivery
Role-specific evaluations focusing on:
  • Operational effectiveness
  • Professional conduct and collaboration
  • Service quality and responsiveness
  1. Internal Stakeholder Feedback
  • Line-manager and leadership evaluation
  • Optional feedback from staff groups served (where appropriate)
School Services Evaluation
  1. School Services Feedback & Monitoring
Structured evaluation of school services, such as:
  • Student services and wellbeing support
  • Administration and front-office services
  • IT and digital systems support
  • Facilities, transport, and safety-related services
Feedback sources may include:
  • Staff
  • Students (age-appropriate)
  • Parents/guardians
Dashboards showing:
  • Service effectiveness trends
  • Termly and yearly comparison results
  • Areas requiring improvement or resourcing
Job Satisfaction & Wellbeing Monitoring
  1. Termly & Yearly Job Satisfaction Surveys
Separate surveys for:
  • Teaching staff
  • Non-teaching staff
Aggregated results showing:
  • Term-by-term trends
  • Year-on-year comparisons
Focus areas:
  • Workload and work–life balance
  • Leadership support
  • Professional growth
  • Overall morale and wellbeing
Professional Development (PD) Management
  1. PD Needs Identification & Planning
Link evaluation outcomes, service feedback, and satisfaction data to:
  • Individual PD needs
  • Team or department PD priorities
Ability to tag PD needs related to:
  • Instructional practice
  • Leadership skills
  • Operational efficiency
  • Service quality improvement
  1. PD Tracking & Impact Evaluation
Record PD participation, including:
  • Internal training
  • External workshops or certifications
Track:
  • Completion status
  • Reflections and feedback
  • Impact on performance and service delivery
Dashboards linking:
  • PD engagement
  • Performance improvement
  • Service quality outcomes
Reporting, Analytics & Governance
  1. Performance, Services & PD Dashboards
Dashboards for:
  • Individual staff (private view)
  • Departments / service teams
  • Whole-school leadership
Insights across:
  • Performance trends
  • Student and parent feedback alignment
  • School services effectiveness
  • PD participation and impact
  1. Role-Based Access & Data Protection
  • Staff: access to own records only
  • Evaluators / line managers: assigned staff or services
  • SLT / HR: full oversight
  • Strict controls for wellbeing, student, and parent feedback data
Expected Impact
  • Stronger alignment between performance evaluation, school services, and PD planning
  • Improved quality of teaching, leadership, and operational services
  • Better staff morale and wellbeing through responsive support
  • Clear evidence for inspection and accreditation
  • Data-driven continuous improvement culture
Success Indicators
  • High completion rates of evaluations, surveys, and PD plans
  • Clear termly and yearly improvements in service effectiveness
  • PD activities aligned to identified needs
  • Positive feedback from staff, students, and parents
  • Measurable improvements in performance and service delivery