Platform Context This proposal is intended for implementation within the Toddle ecosystem. It builds on staff profiles, class assignments, calendars, communication tools, student records, and role-based permissions, while introducing an integrated system for performance evaluation, wellbeing, school services feedback, and professional development tracking. Overview Create a Staff Performance, Evaluation & Wellbeing Management module that supports distinct but aligned workflows for Teaching Staff and Non-Teaching Staff, integrating performance evaluation, stakeholder feedback, school services evaluation, and professional development (PD) planning, with termly and yearly analytics. Purpose and Rationale The system will: Ensure fair, role-appropriate evaluation for all staff Capture student, parent/guardian, and internal service feedback Monitor staff wellbeing, satisfaction, and service effectiveness over time Link evaluation outcomes to targeted professional development Support inspection, accreditation, and strategic improvement planning Core Functional Requirements (Toddle-Aligned) Role-Based Staff Classification Clear distinction between: Teaching Staff (teachers, learning support teachers) Non-Teaching Staff (administration, operations, IT, support services) Role determines: Evaluation instruments Feedback sources PD pathways and reporting views Teaching Staff Evaluation Framework Teaching Performance & Instructional Evaluation Formal teaching observations Learning walks / walk-throughs Classroom display and learning environment evaluations Multi-Source Feedback Self-evaluation and peer evaluation Leadership evaluation Student feedback (age-appropriate, anonymized) Parent/guardian feedback focused on communication, learning support, and wellbeing Non-Teaching Staff Evaluation Framework Non-Teaching Performance & Service Delivery Role-specific evaluations focusing on: Operational effectiveness Professional conduct and collaboration Service quality and responsiveness Internal Stakeholder Feedback Line-manager and leadership evaluation Optional feedback from staff groups served (where appropriate) School Services Evaluation School Services Feedback & Monitoring Structured evaluation of school services, such as: Student services and wellbeing support Administration and front-office services IT and digital systems support Facilities, transport, and safety-related services Feedback sources may include: Staff Students (age-appropriate) Parents/guardians Dashboards showing: Service effectiveness trends Termly and yearly comparison results Areas requiring improvement or resourcing Job Satisfaction & Wellbeing Monitoring Termly & Yearly Job Satisfaction Surveys Separate surveys for: Teaching staff Non-teaching staff Aggregated results showing: Term-by-term trends Year-on-year comparisons Focus areas: Workload and work–life balance Leadership support Professional growth Overall morale and wellbeing Professional Development (PD) Management PD Needs Identification & Planning Link evaluation outcomes, service feedback, and satisfaction data to: Individual PD needs Team or department PD priorities Ability to tag PD needs related to: Instructional practice Leadership skills Operational efficiency Service quality improvement PD Tracking & Impact Evaluation Record PD participation, including: Internal training External workshops or certifications Track: Completion status Reflections and feedback Impact on performance and service delivery Dashboards linking: PD engagement Performance improvement Service quality outcomes Reporting, Analytics & Governance Performance, Services & PD Dashboards Dashboards for: Individual staff (private view) Departments / service teams Whole-school leadership Insights across: Performance trends Student and parent feedback alignment School services effectiveness PD participation and impact Role-Based Access & Data Protection Staff: access to own records only Evaluators / line managers: assigned staff or services SLT / HR: full oversight Strict controls for wellbeing, student, and parent feedback data Expected Impact Stronger alignment between performance evaluation, school services, and PD planning Improved quality of teaching, leadership, and operational services Better staff morale and wellbeing through responsive support Clear evidence for inspection and accreditation Data-driven continuous improvement culture Success Indicators High completion rates of evaluations, surveys, and PD plans Clear termly and yearly improvements in service effectiveness PD activities aligned to identified needs Positive feedback from staff, students, and parents Measurable improvements in performance and service delivery